T12 / IRT-12

Environmentally friendly and socially sensitive urban development

  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Czech Republic
  • Europe
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Italy
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Slovakia
  • Slovenia
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom

Austria


Belgium


Czech Republic


Hana Urbancova
xyhana.urbancova@cazv.czhttp://eagri.cz/public/web/en/mze/consultancy-research/yespossiblynoNational Agency for Agricultural Research manages R&D for the entire agricultural sector, and invests significant funding into its support and development. Thanks to this funding, the results produced by some Czech research teams rank them among the best in their field both in Europe and worldwide.
possiblyklusacek@geonika.cz
Zdenek Semorad
xyzdenek.semorad@mmr.czhttps://www.mmr.cz/cs/Regionalni-politika-a-cestovni-ruch/Podpora-regionu/Programy-Dotace/Archiv-programu-a-dotaci-regionalni-politiky-(1)/Podpora-regionalniho-rozvoje-v-roce-2005/Vyzkum-a-jeho-programyyespossiblynoResearch for Needs of Regions - Ministry of Regional Development of CZ
possiblyklusacek@geonika.cz
Jiri Krechl
xyresearch@czechinvest.orghttp://www.czechinvest.org/en/research-development36yespossiblynoProgramme for support of applied research - CzechInvest Agency. The Czech Republic has a strong academic background which consists of nine main technical universities providing natural-sciences study programmes, including energy technologies. Added value derives from cooperation with leading Czech companies focusing on R&D projects involving advanced technology products.Another aspect of success in research is that the Czech Republic is home to a broad range of science and technology parks and innovation centres.These aspects give the Czech Republic a leading position among its main competitors in the region, according to fDI intelligence source.
possiblyklusacek@geonika.cz

Europe


Finland


Nessling Foundation
Research Director Minttu Jaakkolaminttu.jaakkola@nessling.fihttp://www.nessling.fi/?lang=enyespossiblynoNessling Foundation supports scientific research and communication solving environmental challenges. The total sum granted annually is about 3 million EUR. In addition to general calls in every autumn, Nessling Foundation has opened four special calls during the past 10 years to react the current research needs in environmental protection. Focus is on finding solutions to problems that have high societal relevance. Foundation emphasizes impactful research and researchers’ interaction capacity. Nessling Foundation participates in co-funding in Post Docs in Companies (PoDoCo) project with other foundations. Co-funding is also possible in thematic special calls.
Environmental quality in urban areas, urban climate, air quality, aerosols, impact of vegetation etc. Health as a key theme.possiblyantti.rehunen@ymparisto.fi
Nessling Foundation
Research Director Minttu Jaakkolaminttu.jaakkola@nessling.fihttp://www.nessling.fi/?lang=enyespossiblynoNessling Foundation supports scientific research and communication solving environmental challenges. The total sum granted annually is about 3 million EUR. In addition to general calls in every autumn, Nessling Foundation has opened four special calls during the past 10 years to react the current research needs in environmental protection. Focus is on finding solutions to problems that have high societal relevance. Foundation emphasizes impactful research and researchers’ interaction capacity. Nessling Foundation participates in co-funding in Post Docs in Companies (PoDoCo) project with other foundations. Co-funding is also possible in thematic special calls.
Environmental quality in urban areas, urban climate, air quality, aerosols, impact of vegetation etc. Health as a key theme.possiblyantti.rehunen@ymparisto.fi

France


Ministry of Agriculture and Food
Marion BARDYmarion.bardy@agriculture.gouv.frhttp://www,agriculture.gouv.frunknownyesyesHow to manage the multifunctionality of agricultural soils, also takes into account in the decision making - transverse to several themes. What means of action / levers for actors managing agricultural ecosystems
mc.dictor@brgm.fr

Germany


Italy


ISPRA
Michele Munafòmichele.munafo@isprambiente.itwww.isprambiente.itYesyesno
Evaluation of the sustainabiluity of settlements dyunamics already funded, currently fundingmatteo.tabasso@siti.polito.it
INVITALIA
Edoardo Staculestacul@invitalia.itwww.invitalia.ityesyesyesAs expected outcome I hope to join a transnational critical mass to develop applied research foscused on the selected relevant items.
Funding from the Special Commissioner (Legislative Decree 185/15)already funded, currently fundingmatteo.tabasso@siti.polito.it

Netherlands


implementation programme soil and subsurface
Leo Hamerlinck (via Linda Maring)linda.maring@deltares.nlhttps://www.bodemplus.nl/onderwerpen/bodem-ondergrond/bodemconvenant/thema/kennis/uitvragen/uitvraag-2017/aanbestedingsvormen/xxxpossiblypossiblyThis programme has budget untill (10 mln between 2017-2020) for soil and subsurface. They use the Dutch knowledge agenda soil and subsurface (which is the same as the dutch contribution to the INSPIRATION agenda) as leading research questions. They set out different calls (next call is on climate / rural area, nature / infrastructure or energy, max 150 KEUR, 50% cofininancing needed, deadline Nov 29 2017 ) They are open for collaboration in europe. how and on which topics is not specified yest. Probably theyw ant to arrange this via the Knowledge and Innovation Program Soil and Subsurface (also entered in this database)
possiblylinda.maring@deltares.nl

Poland


Portugal


Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Maria MaiaMaria.Maia@fct.ptwww.fct.ptPermission for what?yesyes
possiblytpanago@ualg.pt
Center on Spatial and Organizational Dynamics
Thomas Panagopoulostpanago@ualg.pthttp://cieo.pt/mission.phpyespossiblyyes
yestpanago@ualg.pt
António José Conde Buzio Sampaio Ramos
218814000antonio.ramos@adcoesao.pthttp://www.adcoesao.pt/AD&Cpossiblypossibly
possiblytpanago@ualg.pt

Romania


Slovakia


Office of the Government of the Slovak Republic
Attila Toth, M.Sc., PhD.attila.toth@vlada.gov.skwww.vlada.gov.skyesnoyes
possiblyMaros.finka@stuba.sk
Ministry of Construction and Transport
Lucia Pospisovalucia.pospisova@mindop.skwww.mindop.sknot yetnoyes
possiblyMaros.finka@stuba.sk

Slovenia


Spain


IHOBE Basque Environment Agency
Ana Alzola +34 94 423.07.43ana.alzola@ihobe.euswww.ihobe.eusyes but only within the interested partiespossiblyyesIhobe is the public agency for environmental management of the Basque Country. As such the organization has limited funding capacity. However Ms Alzola has tried to reflect in her responses the potential interest of the Department of Environment of the Basque Government with respect to the SRA. She is willing to participate in an online match making / meeting in the medium term though.
currently fundinggemma.garcia@tecnalia.com
Basque Government
Ignacio de la Puerta Director of Spatial Planning, Urbanism and Urban Regeneration- Basque Governmentidelapuerta@euskadi.eushttp://www.euskadi.eus/gobierno-vasco/departamento-medio-ambiente-politica-territorial/inicio/YespossiblynoInterested in SRA and in following up the initiative of New Funder Platform
Towards a land use model which allows a balanced territorial interaction between rural-urban- periurban realiites. With particular focus on regulation of commercial land uses: i.e. stimulating local commerce as a driver for responsible consumption patterns, preventing from gentrification, reducing land consumption and negative impacst on landscape, whle contributing to food securitypossiblygemma.garcia@tecnalia.com

Sweden


The Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agrucultural Sciences and Spatial Planning
Elisabet Goranssonelisabet.goransson@formas.sewww.formas.seyespossiblypossiblyMay be a change of Contact person
?yvonne.ohlsson@swedgeo.se

Switzerland


Swiss National Science Foundation SNSF
c/o Marco Pützmarco.puetz@wsl.chwww.snf.chnonono
possiblymarco.puetz@wsl.ch
Swiss Federal Office for the Environment FOEN
c/o Marco Pützmarco.puetz@wsl.chwww.bafu.admin.chnonono
possiblymarco.puetz@wsl.ch

United Kingdom


Solutions that bridge the goals of urban environmental protection and social concerns of urban development are crucial to realize sustainable cities. Knowledge on environmental issues in urban planning as well as on social concerns is partly available but has to be deeper, up to date and better integrated.

  • For founders
  • For endusers
  • For researchers
  • For citizens
Deeper understanding of alternative changes to urban systems will improve urban planning and neighbourhood planning that help satisfying societal needs without unnecessary environmental impacts as well as tempering societal expectations. Research will help to answer which services are needed and to which extent, to provide citizens with quality of life while protection urban ecology.
Developers and land owners, regulators and planners will be able to make more informed decisions that will help achieve their individual objectives without unforeseen or externalised environmental damage. These end users will be provided with hands-on tools that answer which services are needed to which extent in order to provide citizens with quality of life while protecting urban ecological conditions.
In order to trade off the satisfaction of urban demands with the limits of natural capital, appropriate information, indicators and tools are needed that comprehensive yet applicable in practice. Research should aim at understanding and addressing the complexity of the many interests of societal groups and specific ecological conditions in a large geographic diversity in Europe.
Citizens will be more likely to have their needs met without undue harm to the environment and will be better placed to avoid demands that would have unjustifiable levels of environmental impact. Integrated planning willprevent unhealthy living conditions due to a poor standard of environmental protection which may endanger social cohesion.

Better understanding of synergies and trade-offs between environmental and social concerns in urban development is needed. This can be achieved by characterising conflicting goals and measures then seking ways to reduce and or resolve such conflicts. Urban development is confronted with heterogeneous and often conflicting needs. Concerns of urban environmental protection and precautions are strongly interconnected with urban development and have to be considered in planning and decision making processes in manifold ways. However, they are just one concern out of many and have to be balanced with other challenges of urban development, not least with societal demands. These include affordable housing as well as securing energy and water supply. On the one hand, social and environmental needs can have synergies and the concept of environmental justice is an upcoming but central interface. On the other hand, conflicting goals of an environmentally friendly and at the same time socially sensitive urban development can be detected, as for example in the field of energy poverty (greener but more expensive renewable energy puts some households at poverty risk). Social diversity adds to the complexity in some cities as different groups will have different interests and priorities.

Background: Urban development is confronted with heterogeneous and often conflicting needs. Concerns of urban environmental protection and precautions are strongly interconnected with urban development and have to be considered in planning and decision making processes in manifold ways. However, they are just one concern out of many and have to be balanced with other challenges of urban development, not least with social concerns. The latter reflects for instance the needs for affordable housing and security of energy and water supply. On the one hand, social and environmental needs can have synergies and the concept of environmental justice is an upcoming but central interface. On the other hand, conflicting goals of an environmentally friendly and at the same time socially sensitive urban development can be detected, as for example in the field of energy poverty (greener but more expensive renewable energy puts some households at poverty risk). Moreover, complexity is added as also in different cities different societal groups will not have the same interests and, hence, social contexts differ nationally and across Europe.
Goal: Better understand potential synergies and trade-offs of environmental and social concerns in urban development. Identify and more clearly describe conflicting goals and measures with sufficient indicators and find solutions to reduce and dissolve them.
Rationale from the themes: Demand: Urban environmental protection and at the same time social cohesion in the urban society put high demands on a sustainable urban development. Solutions have to be defined to react e.g. on climate change mitigation and adaption requirements, pressure on the quality of the urban environment, demographic change, migration and needs for affordable and adequate living spaces at the same time. While even more people are moving to urban areas, especially in metropolitan regions with consequences for real estate markets and a high pressure on land demand, other regions sorrow by shrinking population density, which also has implications on the environmental and social dimension of urban planning. Questions arise on which services are needed and to which extent in order to provide urban citizens with a good quality of life. In particular, trade-offs and synergies with environmental goods and services must be understood.
Natural Capital: In the light of rapid urbanization processes the urban environment is under high pressure to preserve healthy living conditions for all citizens and protect the functioning urban ecosystem and biodiversity. The urban hinterland is closely connected to the urban ecosystem, its quality and limits as supplier e.g. for energy, water, food, area for recreation as well as sink for disposal. Limits and pathways for an environmentally friendly urban development offering healthy living conditions in relation of cities have to be better understood. Questions arise on the limits of natural capital to enable urban ecosystem services demanded by modern cities and on how to protect them effectively. In particular, trade-offs and synergies of environmental goods and services with human health must be understood.
Land Management: To balance the needs for an environmentally friendly and socially sensitive urban development, solutions have to be defined in daily practice of urban planning on the regional, urban to neigbourhood development level. In order to trade off the satisfaction of urban demands with recognition of the limits of natural capital, appropriate information and tools are needed that are practicable and comprehensive at the same time. Moreover, management is related to questions such as: Which line of arguments do we need to strengthen the consideration of environmental and/or social concerns in planning decisions? What are the instruments to realize urban renewal in a way that addresses social and environmental concerns similarly regarding healthy living conditions, access to affordable infrastructure services, environmental justice and adequate living space for all? Effective urban land management needs to find a way to engage with all societal groups, sharpening their awareness for the environmental impacts of urban development and use efficient economic, regulatory and legal incentives to steer sustainable behavior.
Net Impact: The realization of a socially and environmentally friendly urban development is crucial and its success or failure can have impacts on other regions nationally and internationally, which are often not fully considered in land management on a daily bases given constraints of limited resources (data, time) for decision making. If, for example, socially deprived groups cannot afford life in cities, they have to move to sub-urban areas, with negative impacts on land-take, mobility needs and an adequate social mix of society. Especially in a global context and in fast and unplanned growing urban areas, unhealthy living conditions due to a poor standard of environmental protection can endanger social cohesion. People who can afford it will move while the poor have to arrange with difficult living conditions. Often such direct or indirect impacts on local, regional or global level are unknown and information on them as such as well as methods and data to assess and monitor the impacts are needed in order to inform decision making.
So what? Urban development is stressed by environmental and social framing conditions. Solutions to bridge the goals of urban environmental protection and social concerns of urban development are crucial to realize sustainable cities. Knowledge on environmental issues in urban planning as well as on social concerns is partly available but has to be better integrated and new questions arise at the interface of both dimension, especially addressing implementation and daily practice of urban planning.
Links to other fields: Research in this field is linked to understanding trade-offs and synergies in the different dimensions of sustainable development more generally. Insights might also be relevant for other (than urban) areas of natural resources protection.

Activities: knowledge transfer, knowledge creation, demonstration, networking, assessment and monitoring

Goals: No poverty, Zero hunger, Good health Quality, Clean water & sanitation, Affodable and clean energy, Decent work and economic growth, Industry innovation and infrastructure, Sustainable cities and communities, Responsible consumption, Climate action


National research needs:

... back